Religious websites demonstrate the hollowness of God argument

Here is a simple way to tell if an argument is defensible or not.  Can the argument hold up to criticism?

Anything that can be proven, or demonstrated, can take any criticism. There's always a way to work to a solution. And when someone doesn't get it, you can guide them to the truth. Guidance requires dialog.

Not so with religious websites. Most give long dull self supporting arguments that cannot hold up against criticism. It doesn't matter what St. Doofus said. It doesn't matter if you have a Ph.D. Or not. If your argument is defensible it will stand on its own merits. Or not.

So if I had a doubt about God I should be able to ask you to clarify your argument and you could walk me through my ignorance. Seems reasonable?

Most religious websites have their comments turned off. They ignore all dialog. Why? Isn't the purpose of a website expressing ideas to communicate? No, to those that preach it's about acceptance and obedience and no questioning what is said. Why, even first century Roman society allowed free expression on the walls of the Coliseum. Anyone could post a written note and replies for ALL to see.

Maybe the Romans had a point? Maybe the absolute dogmatism of religious zealots is a problem?

You are free to comment. You can say whatever you like. If you say something interesting, I'll consider it.  If you're moronic, I'll laugh and ignore it. But I don't possess the sin of pride to think my views are omnipotent and above criticism. Religious people that preach demonstrate their arrogance and the hollowness of their argument.