mathjax

Thursday, February 5, 2015

This is why pernicious Islam can't be saved...


http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/raed-jasser-accused-of-train-plot-urged-co-accused-to-stay-
invisible-1.2946486

The minds of extremists, Islamic extremists, are the primary example of why religion gives people rights to act immorally where no self-justification existed.  
The barbarism against mankind manifests itself as a death cult where every infidel is ready for death with no provocation and without justification. Even believers are suspect and their death is acceptable if they are not pious enough. One jihadist on trial is caught explaining,

"Islam is a monster, is a beast," Jaser is heard saying on one intercepted conversation. "Islam is a very powerful weapon, OK, and if it's in the right hands...then you can bulldoze the whole world."
"Islam is here to conquer," he is heard saying. "There is no live and let live in Islam."

and anyone that declares themselves Muslim might be a two-faced backstabber - literally.  The accused went onto to explain his deception,

"We are in a war," he is heard saying. "The war is deception ok, so you need to play certain parts."

Jaser goes on to explain that he is one person around his wife, another around his co-workers, and a different one in front of Esseghaier and the undercover agent.
"But inside, inside I'm very comfortable," he is heard saying. "My heart is very happy."
 The rules of Islam allow this ill treatment including deception, and horrific evil in the name of religion is the result. Explain why anyone could justify this reasoning as an atheist?

If you take your guidance from a 1000 year old book, then admit you're a human robot.



This is Asimo, Honda's generational attempt to make a human-locomotive controllable robot, for a number of reasons one of the original reasons being toilet cleaning. He boots up from power-down into semi-autonomous mode.  Meaning he can accept commands from a person or an instruction list. He has a limited ability to think on his own but will cede to human direction.  He doesn't have the ability to be fully autonomous, in which case he writes his own instruction list.

People have a choice to be fully autonomous or semi-autonomous. Meaning they can choose to think for themselves or they can take their instructions from someone else /something else.

If that something else is a book, an ancient religious book, then you aren't fully autonomous anymore - you are now semi-autonomous. Your program and therefore your actions are restricted by what those instructions limit.
 
People who proudly declare that they take their marching orders from an ancient book, should really be comfortable with people calling them semi-autonomous. Essentially, you are a human robot.