Greenpeace has two priorities;
- Make people aware of Greenpeace and donate to Greenpeace; and
- Save the planet.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/12/13/world/americas/peru-is-indignant-after-greenpeace-makes-its-mark-on-ancient-site.html?ref=science&_r=1&referrer=#modal-lightbox
Greenpeace damages ecosystem for publicity.
This is the most obvious case. But a more egregious case was scaring North America against nuclear energy. That is what caused a portion of our dependence on fossil fuel. Look at France's nuclear industry.
Greenpeace worked to make nuclear power a vilified industry. That damages us all and forces more climate change which is contrary to the stated role of Greenpeace. The fact is Fukushima was a 1950s reactor that should have been mothballed. But histrionics makes it the poster child for the nuclear boogie man. Meanwhile, France is building more modern reactors and our uranium decays in the ground.
Greenpeace ignores it's own principle when it suits them. They work to make fearful grannies upset with misleading non factiness emotional fear uncertainty doubt (FUD) campaigns. And if you side against Greenpeace you must be against the planet. Just because they are emotional and well intentioned doesn't mean they know the facts.
By ignoring viable options they punish all of us for their religious emotional zeal. The mouth frothing demagoguery should not be listened to.
No comments:
Post a Comment